People v. Jennings

1114 Cal. Rptr. 3d 133, 237 P.3d 474 (2010)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

People v. Jennings

California Supreme Court
1114 Cal. Rptr. 3d 133, 237 P.3d 474 (2010)

Play video

Facts

The State of California (plaintiff) charged and tried together Martin Jennings (defendant) and his wife, Michelle Jennings, for the death of their son, Arthur Jennings. Witness testimony established that the Jennings regularly inflicted serious physical harm upon Arthur and refused to feed him, leaving him thin and undernourished. Immediately prior to Arthur’s death, Jennings struck Arthur in the head with a fireplace shovel. Arthur died within an hour of the attack. Forensic pathologist Dr. Frank Sheridan performed the autopsy on Arthur’s body and testified that Arthur was severely emaciated and malnourished; Sheridan also provided further testimony concerning the extensive physical injuries Arthur suffered over the years leading up to the assault. At the time of death, Arthur had three drugs in his system, including a dose of Unisom that would have been sufficient to cause death in a child of Arthur’s size and condition. When questioned at trial about the cause of Arthur’s death, Sheridan stated that a combination of the drugs, physical injuries, and malnutrition caused Arthur’s death. Sheridan further explained that given Arthur’s overall condition, his death likely would have been imminent, even absent the ingestion of drugs. A jury convicted Jennings. Jennings appealed, contending that there was insufficient evidence to establish that his physical abuse of Arthur was a but-for cause of Arthur’s death, rather than the ingestion of drugs.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (George, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership