Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

People v. Kellogg

California Court of Appeal
119 Cal. App. 4th 593 (2004)


Facts

On January 10, 2002, a police officer arrested Thomas Kellogg (defendant) for public intoxication after finding him sitting on a highway embankment gesturing and talking to himself. Kellogg, who was homeless, suffered from chronic alcoholism as well as physical- and mental-health conditions. Doctors found that Kellogg’s mental impairment and alcoholism prevented him from maintaining housing. After being arrested two more times, Kellogg was charged with three counts of public intoxication under California Penal Code section 647(f). Kellogg filed a motion to dismiss, claiming that the charges violated his right to be free from cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution and a similar provision in the California Constitution. Kellogg argued that his alcoholism and homelessness made avoiding public intoxication impossible. The trial court denied Kellogg’s motion to dismiss and found Kellogg guilty of public intoxication based on his January 10 conduct. Kellogg appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Haller, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Dissent (McDonald, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.