People v. Langworthy

416. Mich 630, 331 NW2d 171 (1982).

From our private database of 45,900+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

People v. Langworthy

Michigan Supreme Court
416. Mich 630, 331 NW2d 171 (1982).

RW

Facts

The State of Michigan (plaintiff) separately prosecuted Lundy (defendant in the first case) and Langworthy (defendant in the second case) for first-degree criminal sexual conduct and second-degree murder, respectively. Each man faced a bench trial. Michigan courts historically considered both offenses to be general-intent crimes. Both Lundy and Langworthy argued that each offense should be treated as a specific-intent crime, for which he should not be convicted because he was voluntarily intoxicated when he committed the offense. The judge in Lundy's case convicted him. The judge in Langworthy's case found that Langworthy acted with the specific intent to kill his victim, but that because of Langworthy's intoxication, he had no real concept of the consequences of his action, and therefore was guilty only of second-degree murder. Both Lundy and Langworthy appealed. The Michigan Court of Appeals affirmed the convictions. Lundy and Langworthy appealed to the Michigan Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Fitzgerald, C.J.)

Dissent (Levin, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 742,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 742,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 742,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 45,900 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership