People v. Lopez

240 Cal. App. 4th 436, 192 Cal. Rptr. 3d 585 (2015)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

People v. Lopez

California Court of Appeal
240 Cal. App. 4th 436, 192 Cal. Rptr. 3d 585 (2015)

Facts

Angie Rizzo was 16 years old when she befriended 26-year-old Cesar Lopez (defendant). When Rizzo turned 18, Lopez groped and tried to kiss her. Rizzo started avoiding Lopez, but he relentlessly telephoned, emailed, and mailed packages to her over the years, expressing his yearning for a relationship and reconciliation, despite Rizzo’s repeated requests for him to stop. Ten years after their first meeting, Lopez revealed that he had spent eight years constructing a labyrinth in the shape of Rizzo’s face near Rizzo’s daily running route. Rizzo again asked Lopez to stop his frightening behavior, and he responded with a barrage of letters and gifts. When Lopez told Rizzo that he was coming to see her so they could have a “cleansing ceremony” at the labyrinth, Rizzo reported Lopez’s behavior to the police. Lopez agreed with the police’s instruction to leave Rizzo alone and conceded that the labyrinth and communications might have upset Rizzo. Lopez promised Rizzo he would not contact her again because he wanted her to feel safe. One day, the police spotted Lopez at the labyrinth, and they questioned him. That night, agitated about his encounter with the police, Lopez hid near Rizzo’s house in the darkness and stepped out when she walked by. Rizzo told him again to leave her alone because he was scaring her, but Rizzo repeatedly saw Lopez in her neighborhood, where he falsely claimed to live. Rizzo kept telling Lopez that he was frightening her and she wanted him to stop. Lopez said that he was sorry he scared her but that he could not accept that their relationship was over. Rizzo made a second report to the police, and Lopez was charged with stalking. The stalking statute required the prosecution to show that Lopez had willfully harassed Rizzo and made a “credible threat,” defined as a threat that was (1) verbalized or implied by a pattern of conduct, made with (2) the intent to put the victim in fear for his or her safety and (3) the apparent ability to carry out the threat, (4) causing the victim to reasonably fear for his or her safety. Lopez was convicted, and on appeal, he argued that because there was no evidence that he overtly threatened Rizzo with violence, his labyrinth and blogs were not a “credible threat.”

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Kline, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership