People v. Martin

168 Cal. App.3d 1111 (1985)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

People v. Martin

California Court of Appeal
168 Cal. App.3d 1111 (1985)

Facts

Paul Martin (defendant) was a deputy sheriff who lived next door to his son. One night while Martin was off-duty and knew his son’s house was unoccupied, Martin heard noises and went outside to investigate. Martin saw two young men breaking into his son’s house. Martin returned to his own house, got his shotgun, and told his wife to call the police. When Martin went back outside, he saw the two suspects fleeing and ordered them to stop. One suspect fell immediately to the ground, but the other continued to flee. Martin fired at the suspect, killing him. Martin was charged with involuntary manslaughter. Martin filed a motion to have the charge dismissed, and the trial court granted the motion. The state appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Hamlin, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership