Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status
From our private database of 16,800+ case briefs...

People v. Mayberry

Supreme Court of California
542 P.2d 1337 (1975)


Facts

Nancy B. was walking to the store when Franklin Mayberry (defendant) grabbed Nancy’s arm and accosted her. Franklin followed Nancy to the store and told her in a threatening manner that she was going to leave with him. Nancy left with him after looking in vain for someone to help her, and Franklin told her she was going to go with him and have sex. When Nancy refused, Franklin punched her in her chest. In an effort to gain time, Nancy asked Franklin to let her get cigarettes and entered another store with him. Nancy did not ask the clerk for help because she was afraid. Nancy smoked a cigarette with Franklin while trying to dissuade him, but he demanded she go with him. Franklin took her to an apartment and physically and sexually assaulted her. Nancy did not resist during Franklin’s assault out of fear. Franklin’s brother Booker (defendant) then entered the apartment and assaulted and attempted to rape Nancy. Nancy resisted Booker and Franklin intervened, allowing Nancy to escape. Nancy reported the assault, and the police and other witnesses testified that Nancy was bruised. Franklin and Booker were charged with various counts of kidnapping, assault, rape, and attempted rape and were tried together. At trial, Franklin testified that Nancy had gone with him willingly and consented to have sex with him, and had only become upset after Booker entered the apartment and found her in bed with Franklin, and Booker denied assaulting her. Franklin and Booker requested that the jury be given instructions that they must be acquitted if Franklin reasonably and genuinely believed Nancy had freely consented to go and have sex with him. The trial court refused to give the requested instruction, and Franklin and Booker were found guilty on all counts. The defendants appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Richardson, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 450,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 450,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 16,800 briefs, keyed to 224 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions & Answers


Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Sign up for a FREE 7-day trial