People v. McCabe

49 Ill. 2d 338 (1971)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

People v. McCabe

Illinois Supreme Court
49 Ill. 2d 338 (1971)

Facts

Thomas McCabe (defendant) was convicted of selling marijuana in violation of the Illinois Narcotic Drug Act, which punished first-time offenders with a ten-year mandatory minimum prison sentence. McCabe, who had no prior convictions, was sentenced to ten years in prison. McCabe appealed to the Illinois Supreme Court, arguing that the inclusion of marijuana in the Illinois Narcotic Drug Act violated his due-process and equal-protection rights. McCabe did not present evidence concerning the properties and effects of marijuana or other drugs. However, the Illinois Supreme Court took judicial notice of the following facts: opioids such as heroin and morphine are physically and psychologically addictive narcotic drugs. An opioid user develops a tolerance to the drug that requires her to use progressively higher doses to obtain the desired effect, and if she abstains from the drug, she experiences intense withdrawal symptoms. Opioid use is associated with adverse physical effects and with crime. Cocaine is a powerful stimulant that does not produce physical dependence. However, cocaine induces intense physical and mental excitation as well as a significant reduction in inhibitions, often resulting in aggression or violence. Barbiturates are similar to heroine because continued use in high doses leads to physical dependance, tolerance, and severe withdrawal symptoms. Amphetamine use can lead to development of a high tolerance as well as strong psychological dependence. Methamphetamine, a type of amphetamine, has markedly more intense effects than other amphetamines, and its use can produce violence, paranoia, physical symptoms, and brain damage. Hallucinogens, which include psylocibin, mescaline, peyote, and LSD, are not physically addictive, although frequent use of LSD leads to a high tolerance. LSD users develop psychological dependence and can experience panic, paranoia, uncontrolled aggression, and emotional disorders. Marijuana is not a narcotic and is not truly addictive. Marijuana use does not produce tolerance, physical dependence, or withdrawal, and the drug’s physical side effects are moderate. Marijuana use does not lead to opiate use, criminal activity, or physical aggression, in contrast to earlier expert belief that marijuana use commonly progressed to heroin use and addiction. After taking judicial notice of these facts, the court considered McCabe’s appeal.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

Dissent (Ryan, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership