People v. McChristian

309 N.E.2d 388 (1974)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

People v. McChristian

Illinois Appellate Court
309 N.E.2d 388 (1974)

SH

Facts

David Barksdale, a leader of a street gang called the Disciples, was driving an automobile accompanied by four young men and stopped near 6526 South Ellis. Andrew McChristian (defendant) and Melvin Bailey were also near 6526 South Ellis at the time. As members of the Blackstone Rangers, a rival street gang, McChristian and Bailey knew Barksdale and were capable of recognizing his car. Before Barksdale pulled up, McChristian heard someone shout, “here comes David!” As many as 13 young men lined both sides of the street and started shooting. Officers had been following Barksdale and reportedly saw Bailey fire a gun four or five times at Barksdale’s automobile. Another officer saw McChristian fire a gun once at Barksdale’s automobile. Following a brief pursuit, both McChristian and Bailey were arrested. As McChristian and Bailey were being put in a police car, Edward Dinkins approached the officers and asked why the two were being held. Dinkins was also arrested. McChristian was convicted of conspiracy under the charge that he, Bailey, and Dinkins knowingly and intentionally agreed to kill David Barksdale and his four companions.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Leighton, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership