People v. Medina
California Supreme Court
46 Cal.4th 913, 209 P.3d 105 (2009)
- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
Gang members Jose Medina, George Marron, and Raymond Vallejo (defendants) instigated a fistfight with Ernie Barba in retaliation for Barba's perceived failure to show them sufficient respect. Although Barba belonged to another gang, the gangs were not engaged in any active rivalry. Immediately after the fistfight ended, Barba started to drive away in his car. Medina took a gun and shot Barba to death. The State of California (plaintiff) prosecuted Medina, Marron, and Vallejo for murder. At trial, expert witnesses emphasized the importance that gang members place on maintaining their reputations and retaliating for disrespect, the potential that a gang dispute will quickly escalate into violence, and the prevalence of guns in violent confrontations between gang members. The jury found Medina guilty of the fatal shooting, and Marron and Vallejo guilty as Medina's aiders and abettors. An appellate court reversed Marron's and Vallejo's convictions, and the state appealed to the California Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Chin, J.)
Dissent (Moreno, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.