Appellate Department of the Los Angeles County Superior Court
160 Cal.Rptr. 692 (1979)
Appellant Navarro (defendant) took four wooden beams from a construction site. He was convicted of petty theft. The relevant statute says that anyone who steals another person’s property with a felonious motive is guilty of theft. At trial, Navarro proposed jury instructions saying that if he took the wood beams with the good faith belief they were abandoned or that he had permission to take them, he was not guilty of theft, even if his good faith belief was unreasonable. The court instead instructed the jury that if Navarro took the wood beams with the good faith belief that they were abandoned or that he had permission to take them, he was not guilty of theft as long as his good faith belief was reasonable.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Dowds, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 202,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.