People v. Ogg
California Court of Appeal
219 Cal. App. 4th 173, 161 Cal. Rptr. 3d 584 (2013)
- Written by Arlyn Katen, JD
Facts
Daniel Ogg (Daniel) sexually abused Lynda Gabriella Ogg’s (Ogg) (defendant) daughter, AR, from when Daniel moved in with Ogg when AR was six years old until AR’s friend finally reported the abuse to police when AR was 16 years old. Ogg was never present during the abuse, but AR testified that she told Ogg about the abuse at ages six and 10. The second time, Ogg responded that AR could either call the police or give Daniel another chance but that if she called police, Daniel and Ogg would go to jail and AR and her little brother would go to foster care, where Ogg herself had been sexually abused. That year, Daniel independently mentioned the sexual abuse to Ogg. Ogg married Daniel the following year, and Daniel continued to abuse AR. Ogg told police that she had some awareness of the recurring sexual abuse, that she believed Daniel would not do it again, and that she feared she would lose her children. Ogg’s mother testified that after Daniel’s arrest, she asked Ogg why Ogg failed to protect AR, and Ogg told her, “the kids would come and go, but Daniel would be in her life forever.” A jury convicted Ogg of aiding and abetting continuous sexual abuse of a child. The trial court sentenced Ogg to 16 years of incarceration. Ogg appealed, arguing that insufficient evidence supported her specific intent to act as an aider and abettor of Daniel’s crimes.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Gilbert, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.