People v. Perry
Illinois Supreme Court
224 Ill. 2d 312, 864 N.E.2d 196 (2007)
- Written by Jamie Milne, JD
Facts
Michael Perry (defendant) and his family stayed at the Embassy Suites hotel in Lombard between January and April 2000. After staying at the hotel for multiple weeks, Perry and the hotel entered a rate agreement for $130 per night for a minimum stay of 100 nights. In arranging the agreement, Perry provided trade references and a credit card in someone else’s name. Perry also stated that he was president of Prolific Development Corporation (Prolific) and asked that the stay be billed to the company. Four bills sent to the business address were not paid, and the hotel notified Perry by means of a letter under Perry’s hotel-room door that payment was more than 60 days past due. The hotel was unable to contact anyone using the information Perry provided for Prolific, and when the hotel attempted to charge the credit card Perry provided, the cardholder contested the charges. In May 2000, Perry and his family vacated the hotel without paying the outstanding bill for occupancy, restaurant, and service charges. The bill totaled more than $15,000. Perry was convicted of theft by deception, categorized as a class 2 felony based on the value of the stolen property exceeding $10,000. The court of appeals determined that use of a hotel room was not property under the theft statute and therefore considered only non-occupancy charges in determining the value of the stolen property. Consequently, the court reclassified the conviction as a class 3 offense. The state appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Garman, J.)
Dissent (Fitzgerald, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.