People v. Phillips

175 Cal. Rptr. 703 (1981)

From our private database of 46,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

People v. Phillips

California Court of Appeal
175 Cal. Rptr. 703 (1981)

  • Written by Tammy Boggs, JD


Priscilla Phillips (defendant) was married, mother to two sons, highly educated, employed, kind, and caring. After learning that she could no longer bear children, Phillips and her husband adopted a Korean infant named Tia. Not long after the adoption, Tia became ill. Over the course of the next year, Tia endured numerous medical tests and treatments. Phillips always accompanied Tia, who would seem to improve but then would suffer recurring bouts of vomiting and diarrhea. Doctors had no explanation. Tests during several hospital visits showed Tia had elevated levels of sodium. In February 1977, Tia died with an extreme level of sodium in her blood. Several months later, Phillips adopted another Korean infant girl named Mindy. Mindy and Tia were not biologically related. On the one-year anniversary of Tia’s death, Mindy was admitted to the hospital for vomiting and diarrhea with elevated sodium in her blood. Doctors began to consider the possibility that Mindy was being poisoned, and hospital staff closely watched Mindy’s intake of formula. The hospital tested a bottle of formula made by Phillips, and the results showed an inordinately high sodium level. Phillips was forbidden from feeding Mindy, who quickly recovered thereafter. The state (plaintiff) charged Phillips with murdering Tia and endangering the life of Mindy. Trial evidence included expert testimony from Dr. Martin Blinder regarding a condition known as Munchausen syndrome by proxy. Blinder testified generally about the condition, in which certain people, usually outwardly caring mothers, made their own young children sick to garner sympathy and attention. Blinder testified that he had not met or examined Phillips. In response to a “hypothetical question” as to whether Phillips’s repeated, secretive administration of sodium to Tia and Mindy was consistent with Munchausen’s syndrome, Blinder responded affirmatively as to a “hypothetical person.” The jury convicted Phillips of the charged crimes. Phillips appealed, arguing that the expert testimony was improperly admitted.

Rule of Law


Holding and Reasoning (Grodin, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 742,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 742,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,000 briefs, keyed to 986 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 742,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,000 briefs - keyed to 986 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership