Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

People v. Pic'l

646 P.2d 847 (1982)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 26,900+ case briefs...

People v. Pic'l

Supreme Court of California

646 P.2d 847 (1982)

Facts

A racing car and related equipment worth $120,000 were stolen from Douglas Kerhulas, a professional drag racer. Randall Martin was arrested for the theft after he attempted to sell some of the stolen items to a body shop. After Martin was released on bail, Kerhulas contacted Martin and offered to give him $3000 in exchange for the return of the remaining stolen items. Soon thereafter, an anonymous caller contacted Kerhulas, stated that he, Martin, and others had had Kerhulas’s property, and would return it to Kerhulas in exchange for money and a promise of non-prosecution. Kerhulas contacted the police about this offer, and the police monitored the ongoing negotiations. A meeting was arranged, at which Kerhulas met Dean Pic’l (defendant), an attorney who had drawn up an agreement for Kerhulas to sign that required Kerhulas to promise to do everything in his power to have the criminal charges dismissed and to refuse to participate in the prosecution if the charges continued. After Kerhulas signed the agreement and gave Pic’l $2500, Pic’l led Kerhulas to a house where the stolen property was being stored. The police observed the exchange and arrested Pic’l. He was charged with conspiracy, extortion, bribing a witness to not attend trial, bribing a witness to withhold testimony, compounding a felony, and receiving stolen property. The trial court dismissed both bribery-of-a-witness charges and the compounding a felony charge. Pic’l was convicted of conspiracy, extortion, and receiving stolen property. The prosecution appealed the dismissal of the other charges.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Mosk, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 540,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 540,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 26,900 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 540,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 26,900 briefs - keyed to 983 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership