Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

People v. Pickering

Colorado Supreme Court
276 P.3d 553 (2011)


Facts

Jerad Allen Pickering (defendant) and his friend Jesse Bates went to the apartment of another friend, Eugene Morgan. Two other men, Leon Villarreal and Jose Torres, were also present at Morgan’s apartment. During an argument among the men, Pickering stabbed Villarreal to death. Pickering was charged with second-degree murder. At trial, defense counsel argued that Pickering had acted in self-defense. At the close of the evidence, the trial court gave a jury instruction on second-degree murder which required the prosecution to prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that Pickering knowingly caused Villarreal’s death and did not do so in self-defense. The court also instructed the jury on the lesser-included charge of reckless manslaughter, which required the prosecution to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Pickering recklessly caused the death of Villarreal, but made no mention of self-defense. The trial court also instructed the jury on the interaction between self-defense and the knowing and reckless requirements of the respective charges, and another instruction defining self-defense. The jury convicted Pickering of reckless manslaughter, and he appealed. The court of appeals reversed and concluded that the jury instructions could have been interpreted by the jury as impermissibly shifting the prosecution’s burden of proof. The Colorado Supreme Court granted certiorari to review.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Rice, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Dissent (Martinez, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 173,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.