People v. Pickering
Colorado Supreme Court
276 P.3d 553 (2011)
- Written by Craig Conway, LLM
Facts
Jerad Allen Pickering (defendant) and his friend Jesse Bates went to the apartment of another friend, Eugene Morgan. Two other men, Leon Villarreal and Jose Torres, were also present at Morgan’s apartment. During an argument among the men, Pickering stabbed Villarreal to death. Pickering was charged with second-degree murder. At trial, defense counsel argued that Pickering had acted in self-defense. At the close of the evidence, the trial court gave a jury instruction on second-degree murder which required the prosecution to prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that Pickering knowingly caused Villarreal’s death and did not do so in self-defense. The court also instructed the jury on the lesser-included charge of reckless manslaughter, which required the prosecution to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Pickering recklessly caused the death of Villarreal, but made no mention of self-defense. The trial court also instructed the jury on the interaction between self-defense and the knowing and reckless requirements of the respective charges, and another instruction defining self-defense. The jury convicted Pickering of reckless manslaughter, and he appealed. The court of appeals reversed and concluded that the jury instructions could have been interpreted by the jury as impermissibly shifting the prosecution’s burden of proof. The Colorado Supreme Court granted certiorari to review.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Rice, J.)
Dissent (Martinez, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.