Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

People v. Quesada

Court of Appeal of California
169 Cal.Rptr. 881 (1980)


Facts

The home of Reuben Simon Quesada Jr. (defendant) was burglarized while he was out for the evening, and several items were stolen. Quesada later learned from a neighbor that a man named Edie was the likely suspect. Quesada and the neighbor concocted a plan to recover the property. When Edie brought over a stereo to sell to the neighbor, Quesada and a friend confronted Edie and accused him of stealing the stereo and other property. Edie fled in his car as Quesada’s friend attempted to grab Edie through the passenger-side door. Fearing that Edie would hit Quesada or his friend, Quesada fired shots from a handgun at Edie’s vehicle. Edie was struck in the chest by a bullet and later died. Quesada was charged with murder. At trial, Quesada requested a jury instruction that the killing of a person was justifiable if necessarily committed while apprehending a person who had committed burglary. The trial court refused to give the jury instruction. Quesada was convicted of involuntary manslaughter. Quesada appealed, arguing that burglary at night was necessarily a felony that threatened death or bodily injury and thus justified the use of deadly force to apprehend the burglar.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Grodin, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 177,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.