People v. Roberts

2 Cal.4th 271, 826 P.2d 274 (1992)

From our private database of 46,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

People v. Roberts

California Supreme Court
2 Cal.4th 271, 826 P.2d 274 (1992)

SC
Play video

Facts

Roberts (defendant), a prisoner, was charged with the murder of Charles Gardner, a fellow inmate, and Albert Patch, a prison guard. Gardner was walking down a prison hallway surround by a number of other prisoners when he was stabbed. After he was stabbed, but before he died, Gardner picked up the knife, chased after his assailant and during a resulting struggle stabbed Patch to death. At trial, the jury instructions on Patch’s murder count included the following: “It is immaterial that the defendant could not reasonably have foreseen [the murder of Patch resulting from his stabbing of Gardner].” The jury found Roberts guilty of the murder of not only Gardner, but also Patch. Roberts appealed, arguing that the jury instruction on the Patch murder improperly removed reasonable foreseeability from the jury’s consideration.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Mosk, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 744,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 744,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,000 briefs, keyed to 986 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 744,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,000 briefs - keyed to 986 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership