Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

People v. Russell

693 N.E.2d 193 (1998)

Case BriefQ&ARelatedOptions
From our private database of 22,300+ case briefs...

People v. Russell

Court of Appeals of New York

693 N.E.2d 193 (1998)

Play video

Facts

During the course of a gun battle between Russell (defendant) and two other individuals on the streets of Brooklyn, New York, Patrick Daly was shot and killed. The State of New York (plaintiff) charged all three engaged in the gun battle with second-degree murder. Each defendant argued that only one bullet killed Daly and it was not known whose gun fired the fatal shot. Ballistics tests were not able to confirm whose gun fired the fatal shot. The prosecution's theory was that each defendant acted with the mental culpability required for the commission of the crime and that each intentionally aided the individual who fired the fatal shot. The trial judge instructed the jury that if they found that the defendants joined in the venture and unnecessarily created a zone of danger, then each was responsible and that it made no difference which bullet murdered Daly. The jury convicted Russell and the other two defendants and each appealed. The appellate court affirmed the convictions and each defendant appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Kaye, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 518,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 518,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 22,300 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions and answers

Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 518,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 22,300 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership