People v. Sears

62 Cal.2d 737, 401 P.2d 938 (1965)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

People v. Sears

California Supreme Court
62 Cal.2d 737, 401 P.2d 938 (1965)

Facts

Earl Sears (defendant) was estranged from his wife Clara Sears and had moved out of the family home. After drinking in a bar, Sears returned to the home late at night, armed with a concealed steel pipe. Sears entered the home through an unlocked door and woke Clara up. After Clara entered the kitchen to speak with Sears, he grabbed her and began hitting her in the face and head with the pipe. Clara’s young daughter Elizabeth Olives came into the kitchen and screamed at Sears to leave Clara alone. When Clara attempted to protect Elizabeth from Sears, Sears knocked Clara unconscious and grabbed Elizabeth. Clara’s mother, Frances Montijo, lived next door and ran over to investigate when she heard the screaming. Frances found Sears struggling with Elizabeth on the floor. Sears attacked Frances with a knife and the pipe, and Frances escaped out of the house, running to find her son-in-law Patrick, who lived nearby. When Patrick ran into the kitchen, he found Sears with a barbeque fork raised in his hand over Elizabeth, who was lying in a pool of blood. Elizabeth died from a knife wound to her throat and suffered other lacerations to her face, Clara had a broken arm and broken jaw, and Frances had numerous wounds to her hands and arms. Sears was charged with two counts of attempted murder and the first-degree felony murder of Elizabeth based on the underlying felony of mayhem, which in California was defined as maiming another person. Sears was convicted on all counts, sentenced to death, and received an automatic appeal arising from the death-penalty sentence.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Tobriner, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 812,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership