People v. Steele

174 N.E.2d 848 (1961)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

People v. Steele

Illinois Supreme Court
174 N.E.2d 848 (1961)

SC

Facts

Stephen Steele (defendant) was charged with offering to sell narcotics to an undercover agent and then selling the agent a different kind of drug without the agent’s knowledge. Specifically, Steele offered to sell agent Robert Jackson heroin but then sold him quinine hydrochloride. At trial, the prosecution (plaintiff) called Jackson to testify. Jackson testified over Steele’s objection that he had previously purchased narcotics from Steele prior to the date in question. Steele’s objection was based on the general rule that evidence of prior crimes is inadmissible to demonstrate the defendant’s character for committing crimes. The prosecution introduced this evidence to prove the required element of deceit in the crime charged. Steele was convicted, and he appealed, arguing that Jackson’s testimony was improper evidence of prior crimes.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Schaefer, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership