People v. Strong
New York Court of Appeals
338 N.E.2d 602 (1975)
- Written by Angela Patrick, JD
Facts
Robert Strong (defendant) was a religious leader who believed that his religion empowered him to control physical matter, including another human’s body, with his mind. Strong claimed that he had successfully performed a ceremony multiple times in which he demonstrated his power of mind over matter by stabbing a volunteer in the chest with a knife without harming the volunteer. Strong performed this ceremony on Kenneth Goings by stabbing Goings with three knives and a hatchet. Afterward, Strong noticed that Goings was bleeding and tried to bandage the wounds. Strong also admitted that he felt uptight when he learned that Goings was not doing well after the ceremony. Goings eventually died from the wounds. Strong was charged with second-degree manslaughter for having killed Goings recklessly, i.e., by consciously ignoring a substantial and unjustifiable risk that the ceremony would kill Goings. At trial, Strong testified that he sincerely believed his powers would protect Goings from any danger. One of Strong’s followers also testified that he had witnessed Strong successfully perform this ceremony on a prior occasion. Strong asked the court to allow the jury to consider a lesser charge of criminally negligent homicide, which applied if Strong had been negligently unaware of the ceremony’s risk to Goings. The court denied Strong’s request, and the jury convicted Strong of second-degree manslaughter. On appeal, Strong argued that the jury should have been allowed to consider whether his conduct was negligent homicide instead of second-degree manslaughter.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Jasen, J.)
Dissent (Gabrielli, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.