Supreme Court of California
224 P.3d 86 (2010)
In People v. Taylor, 527 P.2d 622 (Cal.1974), Taylor, Daniels, and Smith planned to rob a liquor store owned by Jack and Linda West. Taylor remained in a vehicle while Daniels and Smith entered the store and robbed the Wests of money at gunpoint. During the altercation, a gun battle broke out during which the Wests shot and killed Smith. Taylor was charged with Smith’s murder on a theory of vicarious liability. Before Taylor’s trial, Daniels was tried for, but acquitted of Smith’s murder. In light of that verdict, the Taylor court held that the principle of collateral estoppel prohibited Taylor from being tried for the same murder. In People v. Sparks, a case with very similar facts, the California Supreme Court instructed the prosecution and the superior court to brief the question of whether Taylor should be overruled.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Chin, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.