Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

People v. Taylor

598 N.E.2d 693 (1992)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 30,900+ case briefs...

People v. Taylor

New York Court of Appeals

598 N.E.2d 693 (1992)

Facts

Two weeks after a woman was raped in her apartment at gunpoint, the woman’s neighbor saw a man knocking on her door and using the fake name the woman had given to her rapist. The neighbor and her mother watched the man exit the building and wrote down most of what was on the man’s license plate. The neighbor then called a detective. The detective wrote down the reported license-plate information and added one digit to match the information to a suspect’s car. This suspect, George Taylor (defendant), was then arrested for that rape and a related rape. By the time the trial happened one year later, the neighbor had lost the note with the license-plate information. Neither the neighbor nor her mother could independently recall the license-plate information they saw that day. The detective still had his note recording the information the neighbor had conveyed to him over the phone. The detective could confirm that the note was written in his handwriting and that he normally tried to record all witness information accurately. However, the detective could not specifically recall writing down the plate information or whether he had confirmed the note’s accuracy, such as by reading it back to the neighbor for confirmation. The trial court admitted evidence of the detective’s handwritten note under the hearsay exception for recorded recollections. Taylor was convicted and appealed. On appeal, Taylor argued that the detective’s note was inadmissible hearsay. The intermediate appellate court affirmed the convictions, and Taylor appealed to the New York Court of Appeals.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Hancock Jr., J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 551,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 551,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 30,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 551,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 30,900 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership