Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

People v. Van Ronk

California Court of Appeal, Third District
217 Cal.Rptr. 581 (1985)


Facts

Van Ronk (defendant) went to the apartment of James Gravelle’s sister, Ruth, to purchase a “pound of pot.” When he arrived, Gravelle informed Van Ronk that he had not been able to obtain the marijuana to sell to him. Van Ronk told James he would return to the apartment around noon. Around noon, Van Ronk returned to Ruth’s apartment, along with a woman named Cindy. They stayed there for about two hours while James unsuccessfully attempted to locate the marijuana to sell. At some point, James and Cindy left the apartment to go to the store, during which time Van Ronk told Ruth he thought he was being cheated. When James and Cindy returned, Van Ronk said he wanted to go, but Cindy refused to go with him. After James and Van Ronk exchanged heated words, Van Ronk pulled out a gun and said, “I should kill you.” James responded by saying, “Get off.” Van Ronk then fired the gun, hitting James three times. Van Ronk then shot at Cindy but missed and also fired an errant shot at Ruth as she jumped into the kitchen. Van Ronk then demanded Ruth come out and told her he was going to shoot her. Ruth begged Van Ronk not to and he agreed if she gave him time to leave. Van Ronk then argued with Cindy over “the money” and then left after she told him where it was. Immediately thereafter, a friend of Ruth took James to the hospital where he was treated for critical gunshot wounds. Van Ronk was charged with attempted voluntary manslaughter. At trial, Van Ronk argued that he shot James in self defense, claiming that James likely had a weapon. Van Ronk was convicted of attempted voluntary manslaughter and he appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Sparks, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.