People v. Vogel

46 Cal. 2d 798 (1956)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

People v. Vogel

California Supreme Court
46 Cal. 2d 798 (1956)

KL

Facts

Robert Vogel married Peggy Lambert in a civil ceremony in 1944 in Louisiana and in a religious ceremony in 1947 after he was discharged from the Coast Guard. They had two children and an unhappy marriage. Vogel was called to active duty for the Korean War from 1950 until 1951. After his discharge, he did not move back in with Lambert. Lambert and the children had moved to Missouri. In 1952, Vogel married Stelma Roberts. Vogel was later charged with bigamy and went to trial. At trial, Lambert testified that she and Vogel had never divorced but admitted she obtained a driver’s license in her maiden name in 1951 and that she had been living with another man in Missouri and referring to herself as that man’s wife. Vogel sought to testify that Lambert had told him in 1950 before he returned to active duty that Lambert intended to divorce him while he was away but not to disclose the jurisdiction so he could not seek custody of their children. The court rejected Vogel’s testimony as immaterial. Vogel was convicted of bigamy, and he appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Traynor, J.)

Dissent (Shenk, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership