People v. Waters

324 N.W.2d 564 (1982)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

People v. Waters

Michigan Court of Appeals
324 N.W.2d 564 (1982)

Facts

Ronnie Waters (defendant) borrowed a friend’s handgun one evening, supposedly just for show. Waters and four friends then drove around and ended up outside a drive-in theater. Waters tucked the gun into his waistband, and the group snuck into the theater on foot. Inside the theater’s parking area, one of the group’s members asked a man in a car for a match. Although the parties later disputed exactly what was said, the man in the car did not provide a match. The group started to walk away, but Waters lingered, making statements indicating that he was upset about the man denying his friend a match. Waters then pulled out the gun, aimed using both hands, and shot the car’s window. This shot caused the window to break and the man to fall sideways into his wife’s lap. Several seconds later, Waters fired a second time. This second shot hit the man’s wife, killing her. After a bench trial, the court convicted Waters of first-degree murder. On appeal, Waters argued that (1) a killing must be premeditated and deliberate to qualify as first-degree murder and (2) the evidence did not support a finding that this killing was premeditated and deliberate.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Cynar, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 816,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership