People v. Weisberg

265 Cal. App. 2d 476, 71 Cal. Rptr. 157 (1968)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

People v. Weisberg

California Court of Appeal
265 Cal. App. 2d 476, 71 Cal. Rptr. 157 (1968)

  • Written by Noah Lewis, JD
Play video

Facts

Muriel Rita Weisberg (Weisberg) (defendant) cared for the two children she had with her husband, Gerald Weisberg. In April 1966, Weisberg’s daughter, Sharon, was about two-and-a-half-years old. Weisberg’s son, David, was born on March 1, 1966, and died in a hospital on April 19, 1966, at seven-weeks old. An autopsy determined that massive intracranial bleeding caused by two skull fractures caused David’s death. In March 1966, Weisberg told a neighbor, Mrs. Slocum, that a bruise on David’s head was caused by his hitting his head on his crib. Mrs. Banker observed David with a severe bruise on his eye, forehead, and head that was black and blue and swollen with red splotches. Weisberg told Banker, Gerald, and Officer Elliott that David injured himself by striking his head against the side of the crib. Sharon had a broken leg. Weisberg told Slocum, Banker, and Turney that Sharon broke her leg by getting caught in her crib. Weisberg also told Slocum that her husband had to get a part-time job “because of that little bitch,” meaning Sharon. Weisberg told Turney that when Sharon was five months old, she had beaten her until she was red, and that another time Sharon had to go to the hospital because Weisberg had given her too much sedative. Once when Turney found Sharon lying in her own vomit, Weisberg said Sharon was just throwing a tantrum and was not going to pick her up. Drs. Gwinn and Kade, a senior deputy medical examiner who autopsied David, stated that David’s head injuries and four rib-cage fractures could not have been self-inflicted. Dr. Gwinn also noted David had received a chip-fracture in his leg three to four weeks before the skull fracture and that David could not have caused it himself, nor could Sharon have fractured her own leg. Weisberg was charged with murdering David and pleaded not guilty. In a nonjury trial, Weisberg was convicted of second-degree murder and sentenced to state prison. Weisberg appealed, asserting there was no evidence of malice.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Fourt, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership