People v. Whight
California Court of Appeal
36 Cal. App. 4th 1143, 43 Cal. Rptr. 2d 163 (1995)
- Written by Sara Rhee, JD
Facts
In January 1991, Whight (defendant) opened a checking account, for which he received an ATM card. Within a few months, he had overdrawn on the account. After Whight failed to replenish his account within a certain timeframe, the bank closed his account. But Whight afterwards discovered that the ATM card still worked at certain Safeway markets. Safeway allowed market customers to get cash back when they made purchases with an ATM card. Each time a customer used an ATM card, Safeway’s computer system communicated with Wells Fargo to verify the cards. Wells Fargo would contact the customer’s banks and would issue a code of approval or disapproval to Safeway. But if Wells Fargo was unable to communicate with the customer’s bank, it would simply issue Safeway a stand-in code to approve the transaction. Safeway would issue the money and later verify the ATM card. After discovering that he could obtain money through this system, Whight used his ATM card at four Safeway markets and withdrew over $19,000. Each time, the computer system had an error that caused Wells Fargo to issue Safeway a stand-in code. Whight was subsequently convicted for grand theft by false pretenses.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Sparks, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 807,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
