People v. Williams
New York City Criminal Court
402 N.Y.S.2d 310 (1978)
- Written by Brett Stavin, JD
Facts
[Ed’s note: The casebook excerpt incorrectly identifies the defendant as Smith.] James Williams (defendant) was charged under New York law with fraudulent accosting. According to the complaint, Williams accosted strangers and engaged in three-card monte, which the state of New York (the state) (plaintiff) characterized as a confidence game. The game entailed a dealer showing three cards to a player, including one deemed a court card. The three cards were then turned face down on a flat surface and shuffled around. The player then had to attempt to identify the court card. If the player successfully identified the court card, he or she won; if not, the dealer won. Williams argued that the charges should be dismissed because there was no finding or even an allegation of a specific intent to defraud. In response, the state argued that three-card monte is a known type of confidence game and, therefore, presumptively fraudulent.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Lang, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 796,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.