Peoples Trust & Savings Bank v. Humphrey
Indiana Court of Appeals
451 N.E.2d 1104 (1983)

- Written by Alex Ruskell, JD
Facts
Humphrey (plaintiff) received a home construction loan from Peoples Trust & Savings Bank (defendant). Through prior discussions with Peoples, Humphrey believed that he was getting a fixed loan at a good rate. However, the loan actually had a variable rate and a pay-on-demand clause. No disclosure statements, other than the note itself, were given to Humphrey. Humphrey became unhappy with the loan and hired an attorney. The attorney wrote Peoples a letter seeking to fix the loan’s interest rate as agreed. Peoples responded by demanding full payment. While Humphrey continued to send the required monthly payments, Peoples simply kept the checks and did not credit Humphrey’s account. Instead, Peoples continued to demand full payment. Humphrey sued Peoples for violating the Truth in Lending Act, and the court ruled in Humphrey’s favor. Additionally, using Indiana law, the court reformed the loan to a fixed interest rate and deleted the pay-on-demand clause. Peoples appealed, arguing that violations of the act did not affect the enforceability of the underlying loan contract.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Robertson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.