Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co. v. Handy
Delaware Court of Chancery
2000 Del. Ch. LEXIS 52, 2000 WL 364199 (2000)
- Written by Mary Pfotenhauer, JD
Facts
Randall Handy, officer, director, and shareholder of Handy Realty, Inc., contracted to purchase a parcel of real property for development on behalf of himself, Michael Ginsburg, and Larry McKinley. Handy then learned that the property contained wetlands, which negatively affected the property’s value and development potential. The Pepsi-Cola Bottling Company (Pepsi) (plaintiff) acquired an option to purchase the property from Handy, who did not disclose the existence of the wetlands. Handy, Ginsburg, and McKinley then formed a limited liability company (LLC), Willow Creek. Willow Creek purchased the property for $174,000, and four months later sold the property to Pepsi for $455,000. After learning of the wetlands, Pepsi brought an action for rescission and damages against Handy Realty, Inc., Willow Creek, Handy, Ginsburg, and McKinley (defendants). Handy, Ginsburg, and McKinley (Handy) moved for dismissal of Pepsi’s claims against them, arguing that Pepsi cannot recover against individual members of the LLC.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Jacobs, V.C.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.