United States Supreme Court
356 U.S. 44 (1958)
Perez (defendant) was born in Texas in 1909 and therefore had U.S. citizenship by virtue of native birth. He lived most of his life in Mexico and voted in a Mexican election in 1946. The lower courts both found that he had given up his U.S. citizenship by voting in a foreign election due to Section 401(e) of the Nationality Act of 1940. This section states that any U.S. citizen can lose citizenship by “[v]oting in a political election in a foreign state or participating in an election or plebiscite to determine the sovereignty over foreign territory.” The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari on appeal.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Frankfurter, J.)
Dissent (Warren, C.J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 237,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.