Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
P

Perez v. Lippold (Sharp)

32 Cal. 2d 711, 198 P.2d 17 (1948)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Perez v. Lippold (Sharp)

California Supreme Court
32 Cal. 2d 711, 198 P.2d 17 (1948)

KS

Facts

Andrea Perez (plaintiff) was a white woman who wanted to marry Sylvester Davis, a Negro man. When Perez and Davis applied for a marriage license, the Los Angeles County clerk, Lippold (defendant), refused to give the couple a certificate of registry or a marriage license. The clerk took this action pursuant to California Civil Code §§ 60 and 69. Section 69 prohibited a marriage license from being issued to whites and Negroes, mulattoes, Mongolians, and Malays. Section 60 declared marriages between whites and the races listed above illegal and void. Perez filed a mandamus petition to require the clerk to issue the marriage license and the certificate of registry. Perez and Davis were Roman Catholic and pointed out that their church had no restriction preventing Caucasians from marrying Negroes. Perez and Davis argued that the Civil Code sections were unconstitutional because the regulations violated their rights to freedom of religion and to enjoy the sacrament of marriage.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Traynor, J.)

Concurrence (Carter, J.)

Dissent (Shenk, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Civil Rights
Family Law

Key Terms