Perez v. Lippold (Sharp)
California Supreme Court
32 Cal. 2d 711, 198 P.2d 17 (1948)

- Written by Katrina Sumner, JD
Facts
Andrea Perez (plaintiff) was a white woman who wanted to marry Sylvester Davis, a Negro man. When Perez and Davis applied for a marriage license, the Los Angeles County clerk, Lippold (defendant), refused to give the couple a certificate of registry or a marriage license. The clerk took this action pursuant to California Civil Code §§ 60 and 69. Section 69 prohibited a marriage license from being issued to whites and Negroes, mulattoes, Mongolians, and Malays. Section 60 declared marriages between whites and the races listed above illegal and void. Perez filed a mandamus petition to require the clerk to issue the marriage license and the certificate of registry. Perez and Davis were Roman Catholic and pointed out that their church had no restriction preventing Caucasians from marrying Negroes. Perez and Davis argued that the Civil Code sections were unconstitutional because the regulations violated their rights to freedom of religion and to enjoy the sacrament of marriage.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Traynor, J.)
Concurrence (Carter, J.)
Dissent (Shenk, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.