Perfect 10, Inc. v. Giganews, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
847 F.3d 657 (2017)
- Written by Miller Jozwiak, JD
Facts
USENET was a collection of individuals whose computers were connected to one another to exchange messages. To gain access, an individual had to use a commercial USENET provider. Giganews, Inc. (defendant) was such a provider. Giganews owned several USENET servers, which users could access. The users, however, drove the content on those servers by uploading text-based files. The files sometimes had other content, such as images or songs, encoded in the text. Users could then use Giganews’s web-browser application to open the files and decode the other content. Giganews did not select the content uploaded to the USENET servers, and the content was distributed and accessible automatically after users uploaded it. Perfect 10, Inc. (plaintiff) owned thousands of copyrighted adult images. Perfect 10 sued Giganews for, among other things, direct copyright infringement, claiming that many of its images ended up on Giganews’s servers. Through dismissal and summary-judgment orders, the district court dismissed Perfect 10’s claims of direct copyright infringement, reasoning that Perfect 10 had failed to show that Giganews engaged in volitional conduct. Perfect 10 appealed on this issue, arguing that Perfect 10 was not required to show volitional conduct and that even if it was required to show such conduct, Perfect 10 had shown that Giganews had engaged in volitional conduct.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Nelson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.