Perini Corp. v. Greate Bay Hotel & Casino, Inc.
New Jersey Supreme Court
610 A.2d 364 (1992)

- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
Perini Corporation (Perini) (plaintiff) contracted to renovate a rundown casino for Greate Bay Hotel & Casino, Inc., trading as Sands Hotel & Casino (Sands) (defendant). The casino remained open throughout the renovation. One goal of the renovation was to enhance the casino’s exterior so it would entice more customers. The project was substantially completed by September 14, 1984. Although only punch-list and warranty work remained, the cranes and other equipment needed to complete that work obscured the casino’s new facade and may have misled potential customers into thinking the casino was closed. Sands terminated the contract in December 1984. Perini invoked the contract’s arbitration clause, but the arbitrators awarded damages to Sands. The award included liquidated damages for whatever profits Sands may have lost from September 15 through December 1984. Sands sued for judicial enforcement of the award. The trial court upheld the award despite Perini’s assertion that state law barred awarding damages after a project reaches substantial completion. Perini appealed. The intermediate appellate court affirmed, ruling that the arbitrators had not been clearly mistaken as to applicable law. Perini took its appeal to the New Jersey Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (O’Hern, J.)
Concurrence (Wilentz, C. J.)
Dissent (Stein, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.