Perkins v. Iglehart

183 Md. 520, 39 A.2d 672 (1944)

From our private database of 45,900+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Perkins v. Iglehart

Maryland Court of Appeals
183 Md. 520, 39 A.2d 672 (1944)

Facts

Lucy Dun’s will left her residuary estate in trust to her son, William Rucker, for life. The will provided that upon Rucker’s death, one-third of the estate would go to Rucker’s widow. The will provided further that upon the widow’s death or remarriage, the widow’s one-third interest would go to Rucker’s child(ren) and their descendants. At the time Dun executed the will, Rucker was engaged to Sally Woods. Rucker married Woods 21 days after the will’s execution. Woods was living at the time of Dun’s death but died before Rucker. After Woods’s death, Rucker remarried, and his second wife also predeceased him. The trustee (plaintiff) filed a petition in the Circuit Court for Baltimore County, seeking a construction of the will. W. Allan Perkins and George Pausch (defendants), the executors of the Rucker estate, claimed that the will’s disposition of one-third of the estate after the widow’s death violated the rule against perpetuities. The appellants argued that by the word “widow,” Dun clearly meant Woods. The court ruled in favor of Rucker’s executors, finding a partial intestacy with respect to this one-third of Dun’s estate. The appellants appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Marbury, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 733,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 733,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 733,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 45,900 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership