Perrin v. Randy Tupper Homes

21 So. 3d 474 (2009)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Perrin v. Randy Tupper Homes

Louisiana Court of Appeal
21 So. 3d 474 (2009)

Facts

Hunter and Mary Perrin (plaintiffs) were interested in buying a home in Lake Charles, Louisiana. The Perrins drove into a new housing development in which there were a number of new homes and townhomes in various stages of construction. The Perrins noticed a townhome that appeared to be near completion and that had a sign on it advertising the builder as Tupper Homes (defendant), including contact names and a telephone number. There were no signs or notices posted on the townhouse itself or the property that prohibited entry onto the property. The Perrins were interested in the townhouse and approached it via a makeshift walkway made out of wooden pallets. Mary Perrin fell on the walkway and injured her shoulder. The Perrins sued Tupper Homes and its insurance carrier for personal-injury damages arising from the fall. Tupper Homes alleged that the Perrins were committing criminal trespass on the property when Mary fell and that the Perrins were therefore not entitled to make a claim against Tupper Homes. The trial court granted Tupper Homes’ motion for summary judgment, dismissing the Perrins’ claim. The Perrins appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Cooks, J.)

Dissent (Amy, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership