Pertzsch v. Upper Oconomowoc Lake Association
Wisconsin Court of Appeals
635 N.W.2d 829, 248 Wis. 2d 219 (2001)

- Written by Laura Julien, JD
Facts
Steven and Doris Pertzsch (plaintiffs) owned lakeside property in Wisconsin. The property was governed by the declarations of the Upper Oconomowoc Lake Association (Lake Association) (defendant). The Pertzsches sought permission to build a home and a detached lakeside boathouse. The declarations established an architectural committee that had certain approval powers and was charged with consenting to the construction of buildings and structures located within property governed by the Lake Association. The declarations also provided that a boathouse was a permissible structure, subject to the approval of the architectural committee. However, the architectural committee denied the Pertzsches’ plans for the boathouse. In its denial letter, the architectural committee stated that the proposed boathouse was not in conformity with existing structures and the boathouse’s architectural design was not in harmony with existing structures with respect to topographical elevation and setback. However, the sole support that the architectural committee provided for its conclusions was the fact that there were no other detached boathouses on the lake. It was undisputed that the proposed boathouse met all required setbacks and architectural control standards that were expressly enumerated in the Lake Association’s declarations. The Pertzsches filed suit, and the trial court found in their favor, holding that the architectural committee’s decision was arbitrary and capricious. The Lake Association appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Brown, J.)
Concurrence (Anderson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.