From our private database of 37,100+ case briefs...

Peruta v. County of San Diego

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

742 F.3d 1144 (2014)

Facts

Under California state law, it was illegal for almost anyone to openly carry a firearm in public. The state also required individuals to get permits in order to carry concealed firearms in public. To get a concealed-carry permit, an individual needed to demonstrate good cause. Cities and counties managed the actual concealed-carry permit programs. The program implemented by the County of San Diego (county) (defendant) defined good cause as circumstances that distinguished an individual applicant from the mainstream population and placed the individual in harm’s way. For instance, a person could show good cause with evidence of a specific threat to the person’s physical safety that was documented with a restraining order and could be verified by law enforcement. The county’s program specifically noted that a general concern for personal safety was not enough to show good cause for a concealed-carry permit. Several individuals (plaintiffs) either applied for concealed-carry permits and were denied due to a failure to show good cause or did not apply because the good-cause requirement made their applications futile. These individuals sued, arguing that the good-cause requirement violated their Second Amendment right to carry firearms in public for self-defense. The district court dismissed the claims, and the individuals appealed to the Ninth Circuit.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (O’Scannlain, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
The procedural disposition (e.g., reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 629,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.
Unlock this case brief Read our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.
Learn about our approach Read more about Quimbee

Here's why 629,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 37,100 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Here's why 629,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
37,100 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
Uniform format for every case brief
Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
Top-notch customer support