Pestana v. Karinol Corp.
Florida District Court of Appeal
367 So. 2d 1096 (1979)

- Written by Douglas Halasz, JD
Facts
Karinol Corp. (Karinol) entered into a contract with a decedent of Pestana (plaintiff) in which Karinol agreed to sell and ship watches to Pestana’s decedent in Chetumal, Mexico. The contract did not specifically state which party bore the risk of loss while the watches were in transit. Moreover, the contract did not contain an F.O.B. (Free on Board) term. The bottom of the contract stated that the watches were to be sent to Chetumal, Mexico. Karinol hired a carrier for the safe transportation of the watches to Pestana’s decedent and gave the watches to the carrier for transport. Karinol also promptly notified Pestana’s decedent of the shipment and gave Pestana’s decedent the necessary documents to obtain possession of the watches upon arrival. Nevertheless, the watches were never delivered to Pestana’s decedent. Pestana sued Karinol, the carrier, and the carrier’s insurer (defendants). The parties agreed that the evidence demonstrated that Karinol performed all its obligations under the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) if the contract between Karinol and Pestana’s decedent was a shipment contract. However, Pestana argued that the term at the bottom of the contract rendered the contract a destination contract. The trial court entered judgment in the defendants’ favor.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Hubbart, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.