Peterboro Tool Co., Inc. Profit Sharing Plan & Trust v. People's United Bank

848 F. Supp. 2d 164 (2012)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Peterboro Tool Co., Inc. Profit Sharing Plan & Trust v. People’s United Bank

United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire
848 F. Supp. 2d 164 (2012)

Facts

Over an approximately two-year period, Bernard Mullan, the fiduciary for the Peterboro Tool Company, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan & Trust (plan) (plaintiff), stole approximately $250,000 from the plan’s account with the Flagship Bank and Trust, a predecessor of the People’s United Bank (collectively, bank) (collectively, defendants). Mullan accomplished his theft via 23 separate withdrawals, ranging from $1,000 to $40,000, from the plan’s account. Mullan sought to cover his tracks by falsifying the plan’s books by recording his withdrawals as transfers to a fake account at another financial institution. At least two and perhaps many more of Mullan’s withdrawals involved his receipt of a combination of cash and deposits into his personal bank account. The plan sued the bank in New Hampshire state court, alleging negligence, breach of fiduciary duty, and breach of a bailment agreement. Per the plan, Mullan’s suspicious transactions should have alerted the bank to Mullan’s possible misconduct. The plan also alleged that the bank’s internal procedures were inadequate. The bank removed the case to federal court on diversity-of-citizenship grounds. The bank moved to dismiss the plan’s complaint, arguing that it was not negligent because, among other things, the bank (1) had no special relationship with the plan that created a duty to protect the plan from third-party fraud and (2) did not have a duty to protect the plan based on its alleged constructive knowledge of Mullan’s fraud. The bank further argued that it did not have a fiduciary or bailor-bailee relationship with the plan.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Barbadoro, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership