Peters v. Archambault
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
361 Mass. 91, 278 N.E.2d 729 (1972)
- Written by Craig Conway, LLM
Facts
Archambault (defendant) unknowingly purchased a home in which the previous owners had mistakenly built a portion of the house on an adjacent lot. Peters (plaintiff) purchased the house on the adjacent lot and, after surveying his land for the purpose of erecting a retaining wall, learned of the encroachment. Peters filed an injunction against Archambault to have the encroaching portion removed. The trial court found that, while it would be very expensive to remove the encroaching portion of Archambault’s house, it should be removed. Archambault appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Cutter, J.)
Dissent (Tauro, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.