Peters v. Firemen's Insurance Co.

79 Cal. Rptr. 2d 326 (1998)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Peters v. Firemen’s Insurance Co.

California Court of Appeal
79 Cal. Rptr. 2d 326 (1998)

AR

Facts

Laurence Peters (plaintiff) sued Firemen’s Insurance Co. (Firemen’s) (defendant) for breach of the insurance contract on Peters’s yacht. Specifically, Peters challenged Firemen’s refusal to cover a lawsuit brought by Susan L., who was suing Peters for giving her herpes. Peters argued that Susan L.’s suit should be covered by the insurance policy on his yacht because Peters’s yacht was “used” to transmit herpes within the meaning of Peters’s insurance contract. Peters claimed that his large pleasure craft was a “sign of his wealth and status” that “fostered romance and sexual conduct” leading to the type of sexual activity that transmitted the disease. The trial court ruled in favor of Firemen’s, and Peters appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Boren, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership