Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Peterson v. Kennedy and NFLPA

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
771 F.2d 1244 (1985)


Facts

Tampa Bay Buccaneers football player James Peterson (plaintiff) had one-year contracts with the team for each of the 1976, 1977, and 1978 seasons. In addition to the standard language in the contract which provided payment of salary if Peterson became injured during the season, Peterson’s contract contained an additional clause which entitled him to his salary for the 1977 and 1978 seasons if he were unable to play due to injury in a previous season. After Peterson missed the majority of the 1976 season due to a knee injury, he was cut from the team during the summer of 1977. Subsequently, Peterson’s agent spoke to National Football League Players Association (NFLPA) (defendant) representative Harold Kennedy (defendant) regarding the collection of salary for Peterson’s 1977 and 1978 seasons. Kennedy wrongly told the agent to file a grievance under the “injury grievance procedure.” By the time the grievance had been correctly routed under the “non-injury” grievance procedure, Peterson’s petition was time-barred and denied. Thereafter, Peterson brought suit against the NFLPA and Kennedy for breach of a duty of fair representation by erroneously advising him to file an injury grievance and then failing to timely correct the issue. A jury in the district court found for Peterson, but the judge granted the NFLPA’s judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) on the ground that mere negligence did not constitute unfair representation under the National Labor Relations Act. Peterson appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Reinhardt, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 218,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.