Petkiewytsch v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

945 F.2d 871 (1991)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Petkiewytsch v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
945 F.2d 871 (1991)

  • Written by Sharon Feldman, JD

Facts

Polish native Leonid Petkiewytsch (plaintiff) fled to Czechoslovakia at age 21 and was sent to an Austrian transit camp and then ordered by the Germans to serve as a civilian guard at the Kiel-Hasse labor-education camp. Petkiewytsch objected to the assignment but would have been imprisoned or executed had he refused it. Labor-education camps, created to house foreign laborers, became punishment camps for labor infractions and state-policy violations such as failing to wear a Jewish- or Polish-identity badge. Although labor-education camps were less repressive than other Nazi camps, inmates were subjected to physical abuse, malnutrition, overcrowded conditions, interrogations, torture, and executions. Petkiewytsch had to wear a Gestapo uniform, carry a loaded rifle, escort prisoners to work, and guard the perimeter and a bunker where prisoners were interrogated and abused. Petkiewytsch was ordered to shoot anyone who tried to escape and told he would be imprisoned or shot if he disobeyed. Petkiewytsch was once imprisoned for failing to perform his duties. Petkiewytsch never used his rifle or struck a prisoner. After the war, Petkiewytsch was interned by the British but exonerated and released. In 1955, Petkiewytsch obtained a visa under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) and became a permanent United States resident. In 1985, the U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) (defendant) sought Petkiewytsch’s deportation under the 1978 Holtzman Amendment to the INA, which provided for deportation of aliens who, under the direction of or in association with the Nazis, ordered, incited, assisted, or otherwise participated in persecuting anyone because of race, religion, national origin, or political opinion. After a hearing, the immigration judge terminated the deportation proceedings, finding that Petkiewytsch had not personally engaged in abusive acts and had served under duress. The INS appealed. Reversing, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) found that inmates were persecuted in Kiel-Hasse due to race, religion, national origin, or political opinion and that the objective effect of Petkiewytsch’s service was to assist the Nazis’ persecution by preventing inmates from escaping. Petkiewytsch petitioned the Sixth Circuit for review.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Lively, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 802,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership