Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Petry v. Tanglwood Lakes, Inc.

Pennsylvania Supreme Court
522 A.2d 1053 (1987)


Facts

Gloria Petry (plaintiff) bought a plot of land from Tanglwood Lakes, Inc. (Tanglwood) (defendant), a developer. Petry built a cottage on the land. At the time Petry bought the land, Tanglwood intended to build a lake that would transform Petry’s land into lakefront property. Before Petry bought the land, Tanglwood showed Petry a development map that included the intended lake. Tanglwood also showed Petry lake-construction documents stating that the lake would be finished within five years and would not cost landowners anything other than the maintenance fees the homeowner’s association (HOA) would collect. Four years later, Tanglwood received a government permit to build the lake. Tanglwood renewed the permit annually for a number of years before getting into a dispute with the HOA. Petry was not involved in the Tanglwood-HOA dispute. Tanglwood and the HOA entered a settlement in which Tanglwood promised to build a recreational area in place of the lake. Petry sued Tanglwood in both law and equity. Petry asked the court to award her specific performance by requiring Tanglwood to build the lake, plus monetary damages for the delay. Petry also asked the court to enjoin the Tanglwood-HOA settlement agreement. Tanglwood argued, and the trial court agreed, that Petry had an adequate legal remedy. Thus, the trial court transferred Petry’s case to the law side of the court, getting rid of Petry’s specific performance request. Petry appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Papadakos, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Dissent (Larsen, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 174,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.