Peveto v. Starkey
Supreme Court of Texas
645 S.W.2d 770 (Tex. 1982)
In April 1960, A.G. Jones conveyed a term royalty interest in several properties to R.L. Peveto (defendant). The conveyance was for a primary term of 15 years and “as long thereafter as oil, gas or other minerals, or either of them is produced . . . in paying commercial quantities.” In November 1973, Jones conveyed to Ernest Starkey (plaintiff) an identical term royalty interest on the same properties, but the deed stated that the grant would become effective only when the deed expired. Approximately four months before the 1960 Peveto deed was set to expire, Jones and Peveto signed an agreement to extend Peveto’s primary term to 25 years. Starkey brought suit for a declaratory judgment against Peveto, seeking an order that Peveto’s term royalty interest was void and that Starkey’s term royalty interest was valid. The trial court ruled in favor of Starkey. The court of appeals affirmed. Peveto appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Sondock, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 178,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.