Pevsner v. Commissioner

628 F.2d 467 (1980)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Pevsner v. Commissioner

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
628 F.2d 467 (1980)

Play video

Facts

Sandra Pevsner (plaintiff) managed a boutique that sold expensive and fashionable women’s clothing. To help promote sales and the boutique’s image, the owner of the boutique required Pevsner to purchase and wear boutique clothing during work hours or work-related activities. The owner would have allowed Pevsner to wear the wardrobe at home. However, Pevsner believed that the wardrobe was not simple enough for her modest home lifestyle, and wore the wardrobe only for work. Pevsner deducted the costs of buying and maintaining the wardrobe as ordinary and necessary business expenses. The commissioner of internal revenue (commissioner) (defendant) denied the deduction on the grounds that the wardrobe was suitable for Pevsner’s personal use as well as for work. In federal tax court, Pevsner filed a petition challenging the commissioner’s determination. The tax court found for Pevsner. The commissioner appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Johnson, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 804,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership