PGA Tour, Inc. v. Martin
United States Supreme Court
532 U.S. 661 (2001)
- Written by Craig Conway, LLM
Facts
Professional golfer, Casey Martin (plaintiff), had a disability which made it very difficult for him to walk in between golf shots. Martin petitioned the PGA Tour, Inc. (defendant) and others to waive its rule requiring players to walk the golf course. After the PGA Tour refused, Martin brought suit seeking a preliminary injunction allowing him to use a golf cart at golf tournaments. The district court granted Martin’s request for the injunction and the PGA Tour appealed. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed, noting that a player’s use of a golf cart did not fundamentally alter the tournament and that a golf course was a place of “public accommodation” under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The PGA Tour petitioned for writ of certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court. The Court granted certiorari to resolve the matter and a split on the issue between appellate courts.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Stevens, J.)
Dissent (Scalia, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
