PHH Corp. v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
881 F.3d 75 (2018)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) (defendant) was an independent financial regulator governed by a sole director. The director held wide authority over the CFPB’s business, including setting the CFPB’s agenda, deciding which regulations to promulgate, and managing the budget. The director served five-year terms and could be removed from office only for cause, including “inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office.” An administrative law judge (ALJ) for the CFPB issued a recommended decision sanctioning PHH Corporation (plaintiff). The director affirmed the sanction. PHH filed suit arguing that the CFPB’s structure, with limited oversight, limited accountability to the executive branch, and limited removal powers, violated the separation-of-powers doctrine.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Pillard, J.)
Concurrence (Griffith, J.)
Concurrence (Wilkins, J.)
Dissent (Randolph, J.)
Dissent (Henderson, J.)
Dissent (Kavanaugh, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.